United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Leroy Joseph Amar, Defendant-appellant, 60 F.3d 825 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseSergio Rodrigo Acchiardo, Baltimore, MD, for Appellant. Katharine Jacobs Armentrout, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD, for Appellee.
D. Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Amar, Nos. CR-90-115-HAR; CA-94-1278-HAR (D. Md. Sept. 20, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Appellant raises an additional contention on appeal that was not presented to the district court. We decline to address this issue for the first time on appeal
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
