James P. Kristufek, Plaintiff--appellant, v. Saxonburg Ceramics, Incorporated, Defendant--appellee, 60 F.3d 823 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseJames P. Kristufek, appellant pro see. Randel Eugene Phillips, Moore & Van Allen, Charlotte, NC; Robert F. Prorok, Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, Pittsburgh, PA, for appellee.
W.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, WILKINSON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing with prejudice his action for alleged breach of an employment contract. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kristufek v. Saxonburg Ceramics, No. CA-94-153-3-P (W.D.N.C. July 15, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
