Anthony Ojo, Plaintiff-appellant, v. John T. Hadden; Jim Brand; George Kearney, Defendants-appellees, 59 F.3d 167 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseAnthony Ojo, Appellant Pro Se. Linda Kay Teal, Office of The United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his Bivens complaint.* We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ojo v. Hadden, No. CA-93-754-H (E.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Defendants of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
