James Tinsley, A/k/a Virgel St. John, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Richard S. Lindler, Warden, Mccormick Correctionalinstitution, Defendant-appellee, 59 F.3d 167 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseJames Tinsley, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, SC, for Appellee.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to strike, rehear, or appeal from the court's earlier order dismissing without prejudice his request for habeas relief based on Appellant's failure to exhaust his state remedies. Because we recently affirmed the district court's prior order in Tinsley v. Lindler, No. 95-6121 (4th Cir. Apr. 11, 1995) (unpublished), we affirm the court's decision to deny Appellant's motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
