Charles T. Sherwin, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States of America; Donald L. Robinson, Defendants-appellees,andstate of North Carolina, Defendant, 59 F.3d 167 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseCharles T. Sherwin, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Edwin Hamilton, III, Office of The United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders dismissing his civil action on res judicata grounds, imposing a prefiling injunction, and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend that judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sherwin v. United States, No. CA-94-48-3-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 11 & 17, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
