Michael C. Antonelli, Petitioner--appellant, v. Edward F. Reilley, Chairman, United States Parolecommission, Respondent--appellee, 59 F.3d 165 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 59 F.3d 165 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted May 18, 1995. Decided June 27, 1995

Michael C. Antonelli, Appellant Pro Se.

D. Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying his mandamus petition in which he requested the district court to order his release from custody because parole commission officials failed to comply with parole regulations, and denying reconsideration of this order. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Antonelli v. Reilley, No. CA-94-2572 (D. Md. Sept. 30, 1994 and Feb. 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.