Haywood Allen Cannon, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Jeffrey L. Miller; Rachel Beaman Miller; Dallas Clark,jr., Defendants-appellees.haywood Allen Cannon, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Russell Duke, District and Resident Superior Court Judge,individually and in His Official Capacity; Thomas Haigwood,district Attorney of the Third Judicial District,individually and in His Official Capacity, Defendants-appellees, 59 F.3d 165 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseHaywood Allen Cannon, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Lee Miller, Greenville, NC; Jacob Leonard Safron, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his two 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinions, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Cannon v. Miller, No. CA-94-120-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 20, 1994); Cannon v. Duke, No. CA-94-110-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 29, 1994). We deny Appellant's motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Additionally, we deny Appellant's motions for appointment of counsel and for recusal of any Republican judge of this court appointed by former President Reagan
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
