Roger Allison, Petitioner--appellant, v. Warden, Bland Correctional Center, Respondent--appellee.david S. Anderson, Petitioner--appellant, v. Warden, Bland Correctional Center, Respondent--appellee, 59 F.3d 165 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseRoger Allison, David S. Anderson, Appellants Pro Se.
W.D. Va.
DISMISSED.
Before HALL and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellants seek to appeal the district court's orders denying relief on their 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petitions. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinions, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Allison v. Warden, No. CA-95-5; Anderson v. Warden, No. CA-95-30-R (W.D. Va. Jan. 12, 1995).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
We deny Allison's motion to compel
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.