Larry Webb, Plaintiff-appellant, v. James White, Jr., Superintendent, Defendant-appellee, 57 F.3d 1067 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseLarry Webb, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, Office of The Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order* denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Webb v. White, No. CA-94-392 (E.D. Va. Sep. 30, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
The parties consented to trial by magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2) (1988)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
