Dan Ames, Plaintiff-appellant, v. General Electric Company, Defendant-appellee, 57 F.3d 1065 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseDan Ames, Appellant Pro Se.
James Hamilton Stewart, III, William H. Floyd, III, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, Greenville, SC, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,* Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant on Appellant's age discrimination in employment claim. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ames v. General Electric Co., No. CA-93-217 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Senior Judge Butzner did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
