United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Salvatore Cottone, Defendant-appellant, 54 F.3d 774 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseSalvatore Cottone, Appellant Pro Se.
Justin W. Williams, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, VA, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Cottone, Nos. CR-89-102; CA-93-904-2 (E.D. Va. Nov. 3, 1993 and Nov. 29, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We deny as moot Appellant's motion for a stay. We also deny Appellant's motion for a hearing based on newly discovered evidence
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.