United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Luther Gregory, Jr., Defendant-appellant, 54 F.3d 774 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseLuther Gregory, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, SC, for Appellee.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and KILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Gregory, Nos. CR-93-274, CA-94-1536-6-20-A (D.S.C. Nov. 16, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
As Appellant did not properly raise in the district court or preserve for appeal the ineffective counsel claim he sets out in his papers to this Court, we do not address it
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
