Dan Kiser, Petitioner, v. Clinchfield Coal Company; Director, Office of Workers'compensation Programs, United States Department Oflabor, Respondents, 52 F.3d 321 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseOn Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (93-777-BLA)
Dan Kiser, petitioner pro se. Ramesh Murthy, Penn, Stuart, Eskridge & Jones, Abingdon, VA; Christian P. Barber, Barry H. Joyner, United States Department of Labor, Washington, DC, for respondents.
Ben.Rev.Bd.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. Secs. 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.1994). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Kiser v. Clinchfield Coal Co., No. 93-777-BLA (B.R.B. Dec. 30, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
