United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. David Charles Mcclinton, Defendant-appellant, 51 F.3d 269 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseDavid Charles McClinton, Appellant Pro Se.
Carl Horn, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, NC, for Appellee.
Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying Appellant's motion for return of seized property. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. McClinton, Nos. CR-89-24; CR-89-98-C; CR-89-99-C; CR-89-100-C; CR-89-101-C; CR-89-102-C; CR-89-103-C; CR-90-17-C-S (W.D.N.C. Oct. 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
