United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Lang Gillford Ange, Jr., A/k/a Duke, Defendant-appellant, 51 F.3d 268 (4th Cir. 1995)

Appellant appeals from the district court's order again denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion after this Court vacated and remanded a previous order.^*  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ange, No. CR-89-136-N; CA-91-14-N (E.D. Va. July 6, 1994). We deny Appellant's motions for appointment of counsel and that the "Previous Panel that Remanded Appellant's Case Be Assigned to His Subsequent Appeal." We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED