Matthew Murphy, Plaintiff--appellant, v. Asresahegn Getachew, M.d.; Willa Darrisaw, R.n.; Alandombrosky, P.a.; Mr. Imode, Pharmacist/medtech; Alexanderwillis, R.n.; Sandra Merson, R.n.; Masfin Gabremichel,m.d.; Brenda Lewis, Pharmacist, Defendants--appellees,andmaryland House of Correction; Rombro Health Services, Defendants, 51 F.3d 267 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseMatthew Murphy, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Melton Andrews, Regina M. Dufresne, KRAMON & GRAHAM, P.A., Baltimore, MD, for Appellees; Amy Kushner Kline, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.
Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Murphy v. Getachew, No. CA-93-2862-HAR (D. Md. Jan. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
We note that because the district court fully considered Appellant's pleadings in opposition to summary judgment, any error by the district court in construing such pleadings as a motion for reconsideration was harmless
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
