United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Gregorio Olivo Peguero, Defendant-appellant, 48 F.3d 1218 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseGregorio Olivo Peguero, appellant pro se. Paul Alexander Weinman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, NC, for appellee.
Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Gregorio O. Peguero appeals from the district court's orders denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Peguero, Nos. CR-90-165-WS, CA-93-36-6 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 27, 1993; Sept. 15, 1994).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We note that Appellant failed to file timely objections to the magistrate judge's first recommendation that some of his claims be dismissed despite a warning that such failure could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. We therefore find that Appellant has waived appellate review of the district court's December 27, 1993, order. See United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 93-94 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1208 (1984)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
