United States of America, Plaintiff--appellee, v. Arturo Francisco Brown, A/k/a Montana, Defendant--appellant, 47 F.3d 1166 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseArturo Francisco Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, NC, for Appellee.
Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Brown, No. CR-90-196; CA-93-466 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 14, 1994).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We grant Appellant's motion to file a supplemental appendix and his motion to file an informal brief out of time
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
