United States of America, Plaintiff--appellee, v. Joseph F. Gretchen, Defendant--appellant, 47 F.3d 1166 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseCarrie J. Coombs, WIDMER & COOMBS, Morgantown, WV, for Appellant.
Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, WV, for Appellee.
Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion and denying reconsideration. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Gretchen, Nos. CR-90-245, CA-93-926 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 11, & Mar. 8, 1994). We deny Appellant's motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate rials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.