Kathleen M. Menefee, Plaintiff--appellant, v. Westinghouse Savannah River Company; Will T. Davis; Chrise. Blair; Nancy Newman; E. R. Hermann, M.d.; E.i. Dupont De Nemours, Defendants--appellees,andsavannah River Department of Energy, Defendant, 46 F.3d 1125 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 46 F.3d 1125 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted Dec. 13, 1994. Decided Jan. 20, 1995

Kathleen M. Menefee, Appellant Pro Se.

Allen William Groves, GLASS, MCCULLOUGH, SHERRILL & HARROLD, Atlanta, GA, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals the district court's denial of her motion for appointment of counsel. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Miller v. Simmons, 814 F.2d 962, 967 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 903 (1987).

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. Appellant's motion for stay pending appeal is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.