Robert Depaola, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Bees Distributing Company, Incorporated; Charles Richardbroderick, Iii, Individually, and As President Ofbees Distributing Company, Incorporated,defendants-appellees, 46 F.3d 1123 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseRobert DePaola, Appellant Pro Se.
Norman Robert Buchsbaum, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders granting Appellees' motion to strike certain pleadings, motion for Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 sanctions against Appellant, and motion for summary judgment in this age discrimination action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Depaola v. Bees Distributing Co., No. CA-92-1885-L (D. Md. Jan. 7, 1994). We deny Appellant's motion to strike Appellees' surreply brief and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate rials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
