Newton Boyd, Petitioner, v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Unitedstates Department of Labor, Respondent, 46 F.3d 1122 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 46 F.3d 1122 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted Nov. 15, 1994. Decided Jan. 9, 1995

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (92-2059-BLA)

Newton Boyd, petitioner Pro Se. Patricia May Nece, Rodger Pitcairn, United States Department of Labor, Washington, DC, for respondent.

Ben.Rev.Bd.

REMANDED.

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.


OPINION

PER CURIAM

Newton Boyd, a former coal miner, appeals from a decision of the Benefits Review Board (Board) affirming the administrative law judge's (ALJ) decision to deny his application for black lung benefits. Boyd has filed with this Court a motion requesting that the record be reopened for the inclusion of new medical evidence, and requesting that his claim be remanded for consideration of the evidence. We agree with the Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (Director) that the relief Boyd seeks is properly pursued through a motion for modification under 20 C.F.R. Sec. 725.310 (1993). See Jessee v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, 5 F.3d 723, 724, 726 n. 4 (4th Cir. 1993).

We therefore construed Boyd's motion as a motion for modification. Because such motions, however, must be filed with the district director, see Lee v. Consolidation Coal Co., 843 F.2d 159, 162-63 (4th Cir. 1988), we remand Boyd's request for modification to the Board with instructions that it be referred to the district director for consideration. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.