United States of America, Appellee, v. Terence Sweeney, Appellant, 44 F.3d 1032 (D.C. Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 44 F.3d 1032 (D.C. Cir. 1994) Dec. 14, 1994

Before BUCKLEY, GINSBURG, and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.


This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and oral arguments of counsel. After full review of the case, the court is satisfied that appropriate disposition of the appeal does not warrant an opinion. See D.C. Cir. R. 36(b).

For substantially the reasons set forth in its Memorandum Order dated July 25, 1994, in United States v. Dale, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by the court that the district court's order resentencing appellant be affirmed.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.