Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Frank E. Young, M.d., Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Etal., Appellants, 43 F.3d 712 (D.C. Cir. 1989)
Annotate this CaseThomas Scarlett, Ann Witt, Food & Drug Administration, Rockville, MD, for Frank E. Young M.D.
Allan H. Kaplan, Richard S. Morey, Peter R. Mathers, Kleinfeld, Kaplan & Beeker, Washington, DC, for Inwood Laboratories, Inc.
D.D.C., 723 F. Supp. 1523.
APPEAL DISMISSED; JUDGMENT VACATED AND REMANDED.
Before: SENTELLE, Circuit Judge; ROBINSON, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
Per Curiam.
Upon consideration of appellee's motion for leave to file a dispositive motion, of the lodged motion to dismiss and of the response thereto, it is
ORDERED, by the Court, that the aforesaid motion is granted and the Clerk is directed to file appellee's lodged motion to dismiss and appellants' lodged reply. And, it is
FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court, that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed. And, it is
FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court, that the judgment below is vacated and the case remanded with instructions to dismiss the complaint. See United States v. Munsingwear, 340 U.S. 36 (1950).
The Clerk is directed to transmit a certified copy of this order to the Clerk of the District Court in lieu of formal mandate.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
