United States of America v. Betty Mitchell, Appellant, 36 F.3d 127 (D.C. Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 36 F.3d 127 (D.C. Cir. 1994) Aug. 23, 1994

Before: WILLIAMS, GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.


These causes came to be heard on appeal from the judgments of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and were briefed and argued by counsel. The issues have been accorded full consideration by the Court and occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 36(b). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED by the Court that the judgments of the District Court are affirmed. There was no reversible error in the trial and no plain error in the sentencing. See United States v. Saro, 24 F.3d 283 (D.C. Cir. 1994).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 41(a).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.