Jerome Feitelberg, on Behalf of Himself, All Others Similarly Situated, and the General Public, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Merrill Lynch & Co., a Delaware Corporation; Thomas Mazzucco; Henry Blodget, Defendants-appellees, 353 F.3d 765 (9th Cir. 2003)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 353 F.3d 765 (9th Cir. 2003) Argued and Submitted December 5, 2003 — San Francisco, California
Filed December 24, 2003

Solomon B. Cera, Gold Bennett Cera & Sidener LLP, San Francisco, California, for the Plaintiff-Appellant.

Jonathan C. Dickey, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Palo Alto, California, for the Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Marilyn H. Patel, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-02-03072-MHP.

Before: Myron H. BRIGHT,*  Dorothy W. NELSON, and Pamela Ann RYMER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

We affirm for reasons stated by the district court in its opinion, Feitelberg v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 234 F. Supp. 2d 1043 (N.D. Cal. 2002).* 

AFFIRMED.

 *

Honorable Myron H. Bright, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation

 *

We deny Feitelberg's Request for Judicial Notice and Merrill Lynch's request for sanctions

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.