Brett C. Kimberlin and Darrell Rice, Appellants, v. United States Department of Justice and Bureau of Prisons, Appellees, 351 F.3d 1165 (D.C. Cir. 2003)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 97cv02633).
On Appellants' Petition for Rehearing
Before: SENTELLE, HENDERSON, and TATEL,* Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Upon consideration of the appellants' petition for panel rehearing, filed on March 28, 2003, and the appellees' response thereto, it is
ORDERED that the petition be denied. Our panel disposition of this case remains unchanged after the United States Supreme Court's opinion in Overton v. Bazzetta, 539 U.S. 126, 123 S. Ct. 2162, 156 L. Ed. 2d 162 (2003). To the extent that Overton may affect our determination that we "need not invoke the four factor analysis the United States Supreme Court established in Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 89, 107 S. Ct. 2254, 2261-62, 96 L. Ed. 2d 64 (1987)," Kimberlin v. United States Dep't of Justice, 318 F.3d 228, 232 (D.C. Cir. 2003), our alternative disposition, that the prison regulations banning electric and electronic musical instruments satisfy Safley's test, remains intact, see id. at 233-34.
Judge Tatel would grant the petition for panel rehearing
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.