Rodney B. Shields, on Behalf of Himself and All Otherssimilarly Situated; James H. Moffett v. Washington Bancorporation; John M. Toups; Luther H.hodges, Jr.; Robert B. Washington, Jr.; Wafic R. Said;john J. Mason, Appellant, 25 F.3d 1115 (D.C. Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 25 F.3d 1115 (D.C. Cir. 1994) June 2, 1994

Before: EDWARDS, WILLIAMS and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.


Upon consideration of the motion to dismiss appeal as premature, the opposition thereto and the reply, it is

ORDERED that the motion to dismiss be granted. Appellant challenges only that part of the district court's order, filed December 6, 1993, that imposed sanctions upon appellant in the form of attorneys' fees and expenses. Because the district court has not fixed the amount of those fees and expenses, its order is not final and appealable. See Crowley v. Schultz, 704 F.2d 1269, 1271-72 (D.C. Cir. 1983).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.