Richard Roe v. District of Columbia, Appellant, 25 F.3d 1115 (D.C. Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 25 F.3d 1115 (D.C. Cir. 1994) April 13, 1994

Before MIKVA, Chief Judge; WILLIAMS and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.


Upon consideration of the motion for deferral of consideration of motion to vacate, and the response thereto; and the motion to vacate and remand with order to dismiss, the response thereto, and the reply, it is

ORDERED that the motion to vacate and remand be granted. The district court's order filed December 21, 1993, is hereby vacated and the case remanded to the district court with instructions to dismiss the complaint as moot. See United States v. Munsingwear, 340 U.S. 36, 39 (1950). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for deferral of consideration be dismissed as moot.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.