Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.arthur Oliver, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Brookfield, Inc., Defendant-appellee, 19 F.3d 1436 (7th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit - 19 F.3d 1436 (7th Cir. 1994) Argued March 1, 1994. Decided March 2, 1994

Before BAUER, FLAUM and EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judges.


Order

The district court granted summary judgment to the defendant in this employment-discrimination case, ruling that the evidence shows without dispute that the plaintiff was not meeting the employer's legitimate expectations. Neither in the brief nor at oral argument did the plaintiff contest the conclusion that his performance from January through March 1992, the three months preceding his discharge, fell short of the employer's standard of accuracy--whether that standard be the 96% the employer contends it uses or the 95% plaintiff says is the real standard. There is accordingly no material dispute requiring a trial, and we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.