United States of America, v. Marvin J. Jennings, Appellant, 18 F.3d 954 (D.C. Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 18 F.3d 954 (D.C. Cir. 1994) March 3, 1994

Before: MIKVA, Chief Judge, WILLIAMS and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.


This case was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments by counsel. After full review of the issues presented, the court concludes that appropriate disposition of the appeal does not warrant an opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 36(b). On consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED by the court that the judgment of the district court be affirmed. We note that reversal is rarely appropriate for asserted errors in instructions to the jury.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after the disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 41(a).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.