Phyllis Day, Appellant, v. Consumers Life Insurance Company, a Corporation, 18 F.3d 953 (D.C. Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 18 F.3d 953 (D.C. Cir. 1994) Feb. 15, 1994

Before: SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY and GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.


This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed December 23, 1992 be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in the court's memorandum filed July 9, 1992. The alleged ambiguities in the life insurance application do not create a genuine issue of material fact. Appellee was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, pursuant to D.C.Code Ann. Sec. 35-414. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.