Thanh Vong Hoai, Appellant, v. Sun Refining and Marketing Company, Inc., Appellee, 18 F.3d 953 (D.C. Cir. 1994)

 Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 18 F.3d 953 (D.C. Cir. 1994) March 9, 1994. Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc*Denied April 12, 1994. Suggestion for Rehearing In BancDenied May 25, 1994

Before: EDWARDS, BUCKLEY and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This cause came to be heard on appeal from the judgments of the District Court, and was briefed and argued by counsel. The issues have been accorded full consideration by the Court and occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED, by the Court, that the orders and accompanying memoranda of the District Court dated October 1, 1990; May 2, 1991; June 3, 1991; September 16, 1991; October 28, 1991; and May 12, 1992 are affirmed substantially for the reasons provided therein. It is further

ORDERED and ADJUDGED, by the Court, that the order of the District Court dated February 28, 1991 and the judgment on the verdict dated October 11, 1991 are affirmed.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 41(a) (1).

 *

Rogers, Circuit Judge, did not participate in this matter

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.