Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit, 105 F.3d 647 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 105 F.3d 647 (4th Cir. 1995) Donald Sylvester GROSS, Plaintiff--Appellant,v.Richard LANHAM, Sr.; Sewall Smith; Eugene Nuth; WilliamH. Strong; Lieutenant Faw; Stanley Auerback, Lieutenant;Lieutenant Rogers; Jesse Thompson; Debra Warren, DietarySergeant; Dietary Sergeant Foster; Dietary Sergeant Green;Dietary Sergeant McCray; Dietary Sergeant Carter;Correctional Dietary Officer Jones; John Doe; Jane Doe,Dietary Staff in MCAC Dietary Department from March of 1992to the Present; Maria Maximo, Defendants--Appellees

No. 95-7738.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 27, 1996.Decided Jan. 14, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA95-684-S)

Donald Sylvester Gross, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Donald Sylvester Gross appeals an order of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of some defendants and dismissing the complaint with regard to the remaining defendants in Gross' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have considered the record and informal briefs of the parties, and we affirm the judgment for the reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum opinion. Gross v. Lanham, No. 95-684-S (D. Md. Oct. 2, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.