Stephen P. Rasch, Appellant, v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Appellee, 993 F.2d 913 (D.C. Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 993 F.2d 913 (D.C. Cir. 1993) March 23, 1993. Rehearing and Rehearing En BancDenied May 28, 1993

Before: RUTH B. GINSBURG, WILLIAMS and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.


This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and oral arguments of counsel. The court is satisfied that appropriate disposition of the case does not warrant an opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 14(c).

The district court set out "the unique circumstances of this case" that established Amtrak's inability to accommodate to Rasch's religious beliefs without undue hardship. We find no cause to disturb the judgment made on the record before that court. It is therefore

ORDERED and ADJUDGED, substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its October 10, 1991 Memorandum Opinion, that the judgment from which this appeal has been taken be affirmed.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15(b) (2).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.