Sandra Long Dow D/b/a Disposable Workers of Comanche Peaksteam Electric Station, Petitioner, v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Respondent,r. Micky Dow, Pro Se, et al., Intervenors, 976 F.2d 46 (D.C. Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 976 F.2d 46 (D.C. Cir. 1992) Aug. 18, 1992

Before MIKVA, Chief Judge, and BUCKLEY and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.


Upon consideration of the court's order to show cause, filed May 7, 1992, the response thereto and the replies, it is

ORDERED that the order to show cause be discharged. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent's order, filed January 17, 1992, be summarily affirmed. Respondent's interpretation of 10 C.F.R. § 2.734 was neither plainly erroneous nor inconsistent with the regulation. See K N Energy, Inc. v. FERC, No. 90-1525, slip op. at 9 (D.C. Cir. July 10, 1992); Massachusetts v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 924 F.2d 311, 324 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 275 (1991). Respondent's application of the regulation was not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise contrary to law. 924 F.2d at 324. The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to justify summary action. See Cascade Broadcasting Group, Ltd. v. FCC, 822 F.2d 1172, 1174 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C. Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.