Marine Transportation Services Sea-barge Group, Inc., Appellants, v. Samuel K. Skinner, in His Capacity As Secretary, Dept. Oftransportation, et al, 948 F.2d 1337 (D.C. Cir. 1991)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 948 F.2d 1337 (D.C. Cir. 1991) Nov. 25, 1991

Before HARRY T. EDWARDS, BUCKLEY and STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.


Upon consideration of the motions to dismiss, the response thereto, and the replies, and the motion to strike exhibits, the response thereto, and the reply, it is

ORDERED that the motions to dismiss be granted. The portion of the district court's September 27, 1989 order on appeal is not an appealable interlocutory order under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a) (1). See Carson v. American Brands, Inc., 450 U.S. 79, 84 (1981). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to strike exhibits be denied. These documents present information relevant to the consideration of the motion to dismiss.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.