Robert W. Wills, Appellant, v. Department of the Navy, 946 F.2d 1568 (D.C. Cir. 1991)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 946 F.2d 1568 (D.C. Cir. 1991) July 1, 1991

Before MIKVA, Chief Judge, and STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS and CLARENCE THOMAS, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

PER CURIAM

Upon consideration of the response to the order to show cause, the motion for leave to file out of time, the motion for summary affirmance, and the opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the order to show cause be discharged. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for leave to file be granted. The Clerk is directed to file the lodged document. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be granted in part. The district court's order filed June 1, 1990, is summarily affirmed substantially for the reasons stated therein. The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to justify summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C. Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980). To the extent Wills seeks to challenge the order filed April 9, 1990, the appeal is dismissed in light of his failure to cite the order in his notice of appeal or "otherwise to evidence his intent to pursue an appeal from that order...." See Brookens v. White, 795 F.2d 178, 180 (D.C. Cir. 1986) (per curiam); Fed. R. App. P. 3(c).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.