Cf Industries, Inc., Petitioner, v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America,respondents,gulf Central Pipeline Company, Intervenor, 946 F.2d 1563 (D.C. Cir. 1991)
Annotate this CaseBefore MIKVA, Chief Judge, and STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS and CLARENCE THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance and the response thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be granted and the petition for review be denied. See CF Industries, Inc. v. FERC, 925 F.2d 476 (D.C. Cir. 1991). The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to justify summary action. See Cascade Broadcasting Group, Ltd. v. FCC, 822 F.2d 1172, 1174 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C. Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980).
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
