Wilson H. Hulley, Appellant, v. Juan B. Martinez and Anton Motors, Inc., Appellant, 946 F.2d 127 (D.C. Cir. 1991)

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments of counsel. Upon full review of the parties' presentations, the court is satisfied that appropriate disposition of the case does not warrant an opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 14(c).

Plaintiff-appellant urges only one ground for reversal: the alleged error in admitting evidence of plaintiff's trust fund and receipt of income therefrom. See Reply Brief at 1. The relevance of this evidence is not disputed. Nor does the record support the charge that the ruling made by the district court under Federal Rule of Evidence 403 constitutes an abuse of discretion. It is therefore

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment from which this appeal has been taken be affirmed.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15(b) (2).