Unpublished Dispositionin Re B & W Management, Inc., et al. Debtors.j.w. Kaempfer, Jr., et al. v. Philip J. Brown, et al., Appellants, 925 F.2d 487 (D.C. Cir. 1991)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 925 F.2d 487 (D.C. Cir. 1991) Jan. 4, 1991

D.D.C., 721 F. Supp. 1361

Before MIKVA, STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, and CLARENCE THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.


Upon consideration of the motions for summary affirmance, the response thereto, and the reply, it is

ORDERED that the motions for summary affirmance be granted. The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to justify summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 624 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C. Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.