Unpublished Dispositionraymond E. Allen, Petitioner, v. George Hyman Construction Company and Office of Workmen'scompensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor,respondents, 897 F.2d 1168 (D.C. Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 897 F.2d 1168 (D.C. Cir. 1990) March 13, 1990

Before RUTH B. GINSBURG, STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.


This petition for review was considered on the record from the United States Department of Labor, Benefits Review Board, and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 14(c). It is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the petition for review be denied. The Benefits Review Board properly concluded that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge was based on substantial evidence in the record. See O'Keefe v. Smith, Hinchman and Grylls Associates, Inc., 380 U.S. 359, 362 (1965) (per curiam); Parklands, Inc. v. Director, OWCP, 877 F.2d 1030, 1035 (D.C. Cir. 1989).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.