U.S. v. Osborne (michael C.), 894 F.2d 463 (D.C. Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 894 F.2d 463 (D.C. Cir. 1990) JAN 30, 1990

D.D.C.

AFFIRMED IN PART AND VACATED IN PART*.

(The decision of the Court is referenced in a 'Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions' appearing in the Federal Reporter. The District of Columbia Circuit provides by rule that unpublished orders, judgements, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. District of Columbia Circuit Rules, Rule 11(c). 28 U.S.C.A.)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.