Unpublished Dispositionvirginia G. Rhodes, et al., Appellants, v. Stouffers Hotel Management Corp., et al, 866 F.2d 1537 (D.C. Cir. 1989)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 866 F.2d 1537 (D.C. Cir. 1989) Jan. 31, 1989

Before STARR, BUCKLEY and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.


This case was considered on the record and on the briefs filed by the parties on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 14(c). It is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment on the verdict, filed February 3, 1988, be affirmed. There is no showing that the magistrate abused his discretion in refusing to allow the testimony of appellants' additional witness. See Rodriguez v. Olin Corp., 780 F.2d 491, 494, 496 (5th Cir. 1986); Smith v. Conley, 584 F.2d 844, 846 (8th Cir. 1978).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after the disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.