V. E. B. Carl Zeiss, Jena, Steelmasters, Inc. and Ercona Corporation, Appellants, v. Ramsey Clark, Acting Attorney General of the United States, Appellee, 384 F.2d 979 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
Annotate this CaseDecided May 8, 1967
Certiorari Denied November 13, 1967
See 88 S. Ct. 334.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; Spottswood W. Robinson, III, Judge.
Mr. Harry I. Rand, Washington, D. C., for appellants.
Mr. John C. Eldridge, Atty., Dept. of Justice, with whom Messrs. David G. Bress, U. S. Atty., and Alan S. Rosenthal, Atty., Dept. of Justice, were on the brief, for appellee.
Before EDGERTON, Senior Circuit Judge, and BURGER and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and was argued by counsel.
On consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the order of the District Court, appealed from in this cause be, and it is hereby, affirmed for the reasons stated in Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V. E. B. Carl Zeiss, Jena, D.D.C., 40 F.R.D. 318 (1966).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
