Cooper Agency, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. Harold M. Mcleod, District Director of Internal Revenue and United States of America, Appellees, 348 F.2d 919 (4th Cir. 1965)

 Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 348 F.2d 919 (4th Cir. 1965) Argued May 4, 1965
Decided August 4, 1965

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of South Carolina, at Columbia; J. Robert Martin, Jr., Judge.

Robert J. Thomas and N. Welch Morrisette, Jr., Columbia, S. C. (Gedney M. Howe, Jr., Arthur G. Howe, Charleston, S. C., Tompkins, McMaster & Thomas, and Cooper, Gary, Nexsen & Pruet, Columbia, S. C., on brief), for appellants.

George F. Lynch, Attorney, Department of Justice (Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Lee A. Jackson and Meyer Rothwacks, Attorneys, Department of Justice, and Terrell L. Glenn, U. S. Atty., on brief), for appellees.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BOREMAN and BRYAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The plaintiffs seek to test their tax liabilities in an action for an injunction and for removal of the cloud cast upon their properties by the tax liens. The judgment of the District Court dismissing these complaints is affirmed for the reasons stated by the District Judge.1 

We recently considered similar contentions and held them unavailing.2  At about the same time the Second and Third Circuits arrived at the same conclusion.3 

Affirmed.

 2

Broadwell v. United States, 4 Cir., 343 F.2d 470

 3

Falik v. United States, 2 Cir., 343 F.2d 38; Quinn v. Hook, 3 Cir., 341 F.2d 920

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.