Culinary Workers and Bartenders Union Local 535, Affiliated with the Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartenders International Union, Afl-cio, Petitioner, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent, 310 F.2d 853 (D.C. Cir. 1962)
Annotate this CaseDecided November 1, 1962
Mr. Lionel Richman, Los Angeles, Cal., of the bar of the Supreme Court of California, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. James F. Carroll, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for petitioner.
Mr. Solomon I. Hirsh, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Supreme Court of Illinois, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and James C. Paras, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, were on the brief, for respondent.
Before WILBUR K. MILLER, FAHY and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The National Labor Relations Board found that the petitioner union had picketed a certain restaurant in violation of Section 8(b) (7) (C) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 73 Stat. 544, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b) (7) (C) (Supp. 1961). The sole issue before us is whether substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole supports the Board's finding. We hold that the finding is thus supported. The Board's order will accordingly be affirmed and enforced.
So ordered.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
