Macneil Bros. Company et al., Appellants, v. Fox, Orlov & Cowin, a Partnership, Appellee, 285 F.2d 277 (D.C. Cir. 1960)
Annotate this CaseDecided November 23, 1960
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; Edward A. Tamin, Judge.
No counsel appeared to argue for appellants. At the direction of court, the case for appellants was treated as submitted on appellants' brief.
Phillip Cowin, of the bar of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Boston, Mass., pro hac vice, by special leave of court, submitted on the brief for appellee. Melville W. Feldman, Washington, D. C., was on the brief for appellee.
Before PRETTYMAN, DANAHER and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Substantially, this is an appeal from an order of the District Court granting motion to quash service of summons. The record is clear that the District Court was correct in its action.
Accordingly, the order of the District Court is
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
