Otto Rusche, Appellant, v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the Unitedstates, et al., Appellees, 244 F.2d 782 (D.C. Cir. 1957)
Annotate this CaseMr. George Eric Rosden, Washington, D.C., for appellant.
Mr. Samuel Z. Gordon, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Messrs. George B. Searls and [100 U.S.App.D.C. 335] Irwin Ba. Seibel, Attys., Dept. of Justice, were on the brief, for appellees. Mr. Oliver Gasch, U.S. Atty., and Mr. Lewis Carroll, asst. U.S. Atty., also entered appearances for appellees.
Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and PRETTYMAN and FAHY, Circuit judges.
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment for the defendant in a suit brought under § 9(a) of the Trading with the Enemy Act, 40 Stat. 411, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 9(a), for the recovery of property vested by the Attorney General in 1950 and 1952 on his finding that it was enemy owned. We find no error affecting substantial rights.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
