Tsukasa Kiyono and Tomoe Kiyono, Appellants, v. Tom C. Clark, Attorney General of the United States, and As Successor of the Alien Property Custodian, et al., Appellees, 228 F.2d 462 (D.C. Cir. 1955)
Annotate this CaseDecided December 15, 1955
Mr. George A. Chadwick, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Webb C. Hayes III, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellants.
Mr. Irwin A. Seibel, Atty., Dept. of Justice, with whom Mr. George B. Searls, Atty., Dept. of Justice, was on the brief, for appellees.
Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and WASHINGTON and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
By a notice of dismissal filed by the plaintiffs, pursuant to an agreement of settlement, a complaint for recovery of property vested by the Alien Property Custodian was dismissed with prejudice. Rule 41(a) (1), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. [28 U.S.C.A.]. The plaintiffs afterwards moved to set aside the dismissal and reinstate the case on the calendar. They now appeal from an order denying this motion. We find no error.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
